Category: Bristol Scholars

Assisted Dying Bill: Why the challenge for MPs is not a lack of information

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

by Colin Gavaghan, Professor of Law, University of Bristol Law School

Anil Douglas said his father, Ian, was suffering from multiple sclerosis and secretly took his own life in February 2019, with his illness at an advanced stage. (AFP pic)

The debate around the latest assisted dying bill – Kim Leadbeater’s Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (TIA Bill) – has taken some unexpected turns. The usual arguments around choice and safety, the sanctity of life and dignity in death, have been supplemented by a range of procedural concerns. Some veteran MPs have even expressed the surprising argument that their new colleagues are too inexperienced to fully understand a matter of such importance. On the face of it, this is a remarkable claim; as Hannah White and Jill Rutter wrote in an article for the Institute for Government,  ‘being willing to use one’s personal judgement to decide matters of national importance – without the comforting guidance of the party whips – is a core competence for the role.’ (more…)

A Fresh Reflection on COP 16 and the Convention on Biological Diversity

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

by Professor Margherita Pieraccini, Professor of Law at the University of Bristol Law School

As 2024 is drawing to a close, Conferences of the Parties (COPs) of three major Multilateral Environmental Agreements are happening in close succession: COP 16 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was held between end of October and the beginning of November, COP 29 of the UN Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is happening in mid-November, and COP 16 of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification will take place in early December. Although exploring the synergies between these three COPs is of great importance and their close temporal proximity this year facilitates such discussion, I will focus solely on the CBD COP 16 as I had the opportunity to attend it in person as a University of Bristol academic observer. (more…)

Enforcement and the Greater Good: The View from Financial Services Law & Regulation

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

By James Davey, Professor of Insurance & Commercial Law, University of Bristol Law School

Assume that we can agree what the greater good entails. And that we can design an optimal set of rules or principles that meets this objective. Who should enforce these rules, and how? This is an issue that caught the attention of leading scholars in the second half of the twentieth century. Papers by Becker, Stigler and Posner are emblematic of an initial burst of activity in the 1960s. This has since developed into a distinct branch of regulatory theory. Over time, this broadened beyond the architecture of public law and has become an embedded element within private law. This co-option of private law, and in particular the law of contract, as a form of governance has been decried by some but is now well established as a regulatory technique (Collins, 1999). (more…)

Copyright and the Public Interest

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

Yin Harn Lee, Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Bristol Law School

‘So … we have what the people are interested in, and human interest stories, which is what humans are interested in, and the public interest, which no one is interested in?’
‘Except the public, sir,’ said William, trying to keep up.
‘Which isn’t the same as people and humans.’
‘I think it’s more complicated than that, sir.’

— Terry Pratchett, The Truth (more…)

The Procurement Act 2023’s Kaleidoscopic View of the Public Interest

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

Albert Sanchez-Graells, Professor of Economic Law, University of Bristol Law School

This blog post is based on the paper that was jointly awarded the Best Paper Prize Award 2024 by the Society of Legal Scholars. The paper will be published in Legal Studies in due course.(*)

Public procurement is concerned with the award of contracts for the supply, for pecuniary interest, of goods, services or works to the public sector. At its heart, public procurement governs the expenditure of public funds and, ultimately, should ensure that such expenditure is in the public interest. One could be forgiven for simplifying the goal of procurement to ensuring that public money is well spent, which could be further elaborated (following Schooner 2002) to encompass promoting integrity and value for money in the award of public contracts, and acting transparently to facilitate accountability. Even at this level of simplification, however, there is scope for contestation of e.g. what value for money entails (with a long-running debate on price/quality trade-offs), or whether it can or must (solely) be promoted through market-based competition (see e.g. Sanchez-Graells 2015, addressing the objections raised by Arrowsmith 2012 and Kunzlik 2013). (more…)

The public interest in environmental law: a pragmatist turn

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

Margherita Pieraccini, Professor of Law, University of Bristol Law School.

In a paper recently published in the Journal of Environmental Law, I argue that defining the public interest and deciding in the public interest is especially problematic in fields where decisions concern collective action problems, involve multiple actors, crosstemporal and spatial scales, and occur under conditions of knowledge uncertainty. This is because there are multiple, collective, private, diffuse publics that gather around the problem in question. One such field is environmental law, on which the paper focuses. (more…)

How and why should legal scholars develop capability to work with legal futures?

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

by Professors Amanda Perry-Kessaris and Elen Stokes

How might we legal scholars develop our capability to work with legal futures? Why ought we to try? These questions lay at the heart of a one-day capacity-building Workshop held at the University of Bristol in July 2024, led by Elen Stokes and Amanda Perry-Kessaris.

We use the term ‘legal futures’ to refer to relationships that reach between the here-and-now and the yet-to-come, and in which legal thinking and practice might play a role. (more…)

‘Computer says no’: Is automation in the public interest?

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

By Kit Fotheringham, Bristol Doctoral College (University of Bristol)

Photo by Francisco De Legarreta C. on Unsplash

In common with many developed nations, the public sector in the UK takes up a sizable proportion of economic activity. Therefore, the way the public sector is run is of interest to the public, both as citizens, who expect good administration of public services, and as taxpayers, who contribute to public finances. Of course, not all citizens are taxpayers (especially children and those on low incomes), nor can all taxpayers be regarded as citizens (notably, companies). Some scholars even question whether the balance sheet of a sovereign government with its own currency is comparable to the household pocketbook, positing that government spending contributes to overall money supply. Nevertheless, politicians play to the narrative that public money is the collective property of taxpayers, and seeking to persuade voters that their policies will offer the best protection against further encroachment on the economic interests of individuals. (more…)

Pensions on divorce – research-based guidance to encourage fairer outcomes for divorcing couples

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

Beth Kirkland of Law for Life and Hilary Woodward, Honorary Senior Research Fellow, on behalf of the Pension Advisory Group

Back in 2014 the Nuffield Foundation funded the first empirical study of the use of pension sharing orders within divorce proceedings in England and Wales. The findings of that study were illuminating. The researchers found a widespread lack of confidence amongst practitioners on the issue of pensions on divorce. Close examination of a random selection of court files showed poor quality pension disclosure, unclear or inadequate valuations of the pensions that were disclosed, and a substantial proportion of potentially irrational or unfair outcomes. (more…)

Learning from Others at the 115th SLS Conference: Lessons for Legal Scholars?

Posted on by foluke.adebisi

Professor Paula Giliker (SLS President 2023-2024) and Professor of Comparative Law, University of Bristol

As Society of Legal Scholars (SLS) President, I was delighted to welcome over 460 delegates to the 115th SLS Conference held at the University of Bristol on 3-5 September 2024.  The conference attracted delegates from all over the world, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria and South Africa.  In its 27 subject sections, 283 papers were presented, and the Society’s Peter Birks and Margaret Brazier Book Prizes for Outstanding Legal Scholarship were presented at the Annual Dinner on Wednesday 5th September. (more…)