Thinking about violence

by Henry Jones, Associate Professor in International Law, Durham Law School

This blog considers different forms and justifications for violence, ultimately supporting non-violence. It is part of the Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network blog series.

What is violence? Is it ever justified? Is it inevitable? Who does violence to whom? The question of violence is a major theme of 20th century political theory. Rosa Luxemborg described violent struggle as the place where the proletariat become human beings.[1]   In the 21st century, the place of violence is much more ambiguous. Partly because the violence of the state has become so much more total and all-pervasive and partly because the balance of arms is so unequal. This blog considers different forms and justifications for violence, ultimately agreeing with proposals for a radical non-violence. (more…)

UK tort law on human rights abuses in supply chains: The Dyson Litigation

by Chris Riley, Reader in Commercial Law at Durham Law School, and Irene-marié Esser, Professor of Corporate Law and Governance in the School of Law, University of Glasgow

A Dyson handheld vacuum—emphasis on logo. Daniel Foster, CC BY-NC 2.0

This blog considers the extent to which UK courts are willing to adjudicate upon harms committed overseas in connection with UK company supply chains. This blog is part of the Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network blog series.

Introduction

Recent years have seen a steady stream of litigation brought against UK parent companies for the environmental harm and human rights abuses caused by their overseas subsidiaries.  This blog considers the Court of Appeal decision of Limbu v Dyson Technology Ltd, which is significant in providing new information on how UK courts treat tortious wrongdoing in UK company supply chains. (more…)

A Postcolonial Critique of Kadie Kalma v African Minerals Ltd

by Dr Jane Rooney, Associate Professor in International Law at Durham Law School

This blog post is a post-colonial critique of the narrative produced by Judge Turner in the High Court decision of Kadie Kalma v African Minerals Ltd that dismantles the distance between England and Sierra Leone. This blog is part of the Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network blog series. (more…)

The international legal implications of supporting Israel, in light of the ICJ’s provisional measures and advisory opinion

by Dr. Kathryn Allinson, Lecturer in Law, University of Bristol

Destruction in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Image by Hosny Salah, a Palestinian photographer living in the Gaza Strip. Follow him on Pixabay

The UK government is currently in the High Court defending its ongoing supply of fighter jet components to Israel. The legal dispute centres on the government’s choice to exclude F-35 parts while halting 30 arms licenses to Israel in September 2024. The F-35 plays a crucial role in Israel’s operations in Gaza, enabling the deployment of highly destructive missile strikes. An incident on July 30 resulted in the deaths of 90 Palestinians and injuries to over 300. The lawsuit contends that the UK government’s policy violates the Strategic Export Licensing Criteria, which prohibit the sale of arms to nations where they could be used in violation of international law. (more…)

Free Prior and Informed Consent as a collective right against business interests: insights from indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia

by Isabel Inguanzo Associate Professor Department of Political Science & Administration, University of Salamanca, Spain.

 

In this blog post Professor Inguanzo evaluates the efficacy of free, prior and informed consent for protecting indigenous people against appropriation of ancestral land for business enterprise. (more…)

Combatting Human Rights Impacts in Mining in Sierra Leone

Source Wikipedia

This blog features a conversation between Solomon Moses Sogbandi and Jane Rooney. Solomon discusses the impact of Amnesty International Sierra Leone’s report on MEYA mining human rights abuses; the reform of the Mines and Minerals Act 2009; the Koidu Limited Mining Company in the Kono District; and what is, if any, the UK’s role in combating human rights abuses in mining in Sierra Leone. (more…)

Introduction to Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network Blog Series

Dr Lee McConnell is a Senior Lecturer in International Law at the University of Bristol Law School and the primary investigator on the Arts and Humanity Research Council Research Networking Scheme AH/W0072X/1 project, Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network. Dr Jane Rooney is a Co-investigator and Associate Professor in International Law at Durham Law School. Our Project Partner is the NGO Rights and Accountability in Development.

The Extractive Industry and Foreign Security Network is an international, multi-stakeholder, interdisciplinary research network that investigates adverse human rights impacts arising from the interactions between UK-based extractive industries and the security forces in foreign States.

This blog series distils discussions that took place during the three workshops and two public engagement events from 2023-2024 funded by the AHRC. This series is published alongside a commissioned contribution in a forthcoming Debates and Dialogue Section of the Social and Legal Studies Journal. (more…)

BABEL project researchers work with University of Bristol students to raise awareness of mental capacity law

by Gus Harrison, Judy Laing, Sheelagh McGuinness, and Patty Miranda

Setting the stage: six years of the BABEL project

The Wellcome-funded BABEL project at the University of Bristol has, for the last six years or so, been exploring best interests decision making for adults and children in England and Wales. The collaborative project started towards the end of 2018 and involved several different work strands with researchers based in the Centre for Health, Law, and Society (CHLS) and the Centre for Ethics in Medicine.  The law work strand, based in the CHLS at the Law School, focused on best interests decision-making in law. The law research team – Judy Laing, Sheelagh McGuinness, and Aoife Finnerty—carried out empirical research with legal practitioners to find out their views about this branch of legal decision-making. The research findings are now being written up and will be published later this year, including in an edited book, to be published by Bristol University Press in 2026. (more…)